losses incurred (difference between receipts from sɛles
and total invoice cost to His Majesty's Government is in
the region of £8 millions it is felt that there is a
very strong cuse for asking the Malayan Governments to
contribute a share of the total cost over and above what
they have already puid.
2. It is true that the goods inuestion, by force of
circumstances, were ordered without the knowledge of the
Kulayan Governments and that in certain cases they may
have proved unsuitable. As I said in my telegrɛm under
reference, His Majesty's Government are not repeat not disposed to adopt un uncompromising attitude in this
mtter, and I appreciate that a demand by His Majesty's
Government for rull payment in respect of these stores
would do much to undermine the political value of the
whole financial settlcment. There is, however, one
class of goods in relation to which I feel, after
considering the whole matter most carefully, that
further payment can properly be regarded us due from
the Malayan Governmenta. I refer to those goods which
were taken over and used by the Governments themselves
for their own purposes, with the result that there will
although the value of the
goods in question may have been considerable. I appreciate
have been no proceeds from sales
that at this stage it would be very difficult to arrive at
an exact assessment of the cost of any such goods or út an
exact apportionment between Singapore and the Federation of
Melayu. I do not repeat not feel, however, that this should
prevent a solution on broadly equitable lines. I should
be grateful therefore, if the two Governments unless they
have comments of principle (in which cuse they should
inform me without delay) would look into the mutter at their
early convenience and reach the best possible estimute of
the sume involved with a view to a final settlement being
reached.
J
3.
At
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.